![]() ![]() By comparison, it took me only about five minutes to enter the same data in the most efficient program, Family Historian, but close to 12 minutes in most of the programs I tested. I entered the data for 10 individuals in a total of less than eight minutes. Overall, the data entry process is efficient. That said, the floating tabs are a bit too subtle, making it a little more difficult to figure out there are floating tabs to work in. With many people making the switch from Family Tree Maker to RootsMagic, the makers of RootsMagic have made this short video to show you how to import your files into the program. The well-crafted interface uses a mostly modeless design. The navigation received a B+ and the data entry received an A– for ease of use. ![]() If there’s an issue with a relationship early in the pedigree chart, such as a same-sex marriage, the subsequent relationships all must be re-established. In fact, the RootsMagic interpreted the fourth file exactly as Ancestral Quest did, getting all the individual information correct but losing the relationships. .available in both the exporting program and importing program to make sure you select a compatible version of the GEDCOM standard and character set. The fourth record, however, was full of errors. ![]() I imported four GEDCOM records to test the program, and it was almost perfectly accurate on three of the records, losing a handful of media files. RootsMagic earned a B on the GEDCOM accuracy test. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |